Making Citizenship Real
If we want citizenship to be real - for everyone - then we must transform how our society works.
Although we can call someone a citizen and say we wish to treat them as an equal it turns out that there are some very real things we need to do in order to make such a claim real. Stigma and pride take hold so easily, and so societies must learn how to clothe each other in citizenship.
My own account of the keys to citizenship is rooted in the practical work of supporting people with intellectual disabilities to build good lives for themselves. You can read more about these ideas and their practical consequences here:Keys to Citizenship
There is a philosophical logic to my presentation of these elements of citizenship, but each element is distinct and can develop somewhat independently of the other elements.
In my account of citizenship we can identify seven keys to citizenship:
- Purpose - we live a life of meaning
- Freedom - we can pursue our purpose
- Money - we have the means to pursue our goals
- Home - we can belong in community, but also protect our privacy
- Help - we can offer others opportunity
- Life - we can contribute in our own way
- Love - we can build relationships and new life
A distinct sense of hope and purpose in life turns out to be critical to self-respect and to the respect that others give you. If we meet someone who is adrift, in a life without meaning or purpose, we struggle to respect them. If we meet someone who has a sense of purpose then it becomes easier to engage with them as a distinct equal. Notice however that uniformity of purpose is not helpful and does not stimulate respect. You have no reason to respect the purposes of people who share exactly the same goals as others or yourself. In a strange way such uniformity breeds contempt.
Beyond a sense of purpose people need to be free to realise their purposes. If someone is utterly under the control of someone else then their dreams and plans lack integrity. It is only when we see that someone is free to follow their purpose that we can respect them as a free individual. In the same way, our self-respect is diminished if we are imprisoned - even when that prison may be provided by the love and care of others.
In the modern world our active civic engagement also requires sufficient money to make our purposes meaningful. Although it is possible to imagine a world where there was no money it is uncomfortable to realise that this would mean that people would only do what you need them to do from either love or fear. Money makes possible free exchange, specialisation and a plurality of useful opportunities for contribution and employment. In passing it is also worth noticing that, from the perspective of citizenship, the right to money ceases when someone has sufficient money to be able to enter into and engage in citizenship - freed from gnawing poverty. However the super-rich are also at risk of leaving the realm of citizenship.
The fourth key to citizenship is a home - a physical location where one belongs, where one can retreat to in privacy and which one can leave to enter the public realm. Over exposure to the public realm or severe communality is a threat to citizenship. The private nurtures the capacity for self-development and offers a haven to families.
The fifth key to citizenship is the need for assistance - help. This is one of the most important, but most frequently missed, aspects of citizenship. A citizen who has no need of anyone is not a citizen. They offer others no opportunity for contribution - they are a ghost amidst the living. The balanced position is to avoid undue dependence, where the need for help leaves one in servile reliance on others. We can need the help of others, and yet still maintain our independence - our freedom.
Citizens recieve, and citizens also give, and while there is no virtue in achieving some perfect balance - that would be both impossible and meaningless - contribution is vital to citizenship and the self-respect of the individual. And we contribute by living - by joining in, working, caring and taking care of each other. Life can only develop though our active contribution to community.
Finally the fruit of citizneship, and its ultimate source is love. Love is of course a greater force than citizenship - nevertheless it does relfect successful citizenship. This is all forms of love: agape, storge, philia and eros.
This account of citizenship is offered as a bridge. Political theorists rarely think about disabled people or others who can experience severe disadvantage because of the prejudices, barriers and structures imposed by the majority. Disabled people have been developing interesting accounts of social value and social justice - but often cut-off form mainstream thought. I have developed this model of citizenship to demonstrate how relevant are these experiences and theories to mainstream political thought.
If our society is not aiming to be a community of citizens what is its goal? If theorists are not advocating citizenship for all, what are they advocating?